🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a growing group of states are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". A law could be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to enact a law increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," commented one parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any action must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to disturbing social media material argues that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," stated a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to follow the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond these regions, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more nuanced tone. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this global conversation evolves, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.